Gun Control Essays (1624 words) - Gun Politics In The United States

Gun Control Americans are faced with an ever-growing problem of violence. Our streets have become a battleground where the elderly are beaten for their social security checks, where terrified women are viciously attacked and raped, where teen-age gangsters shoot it out for a patch of turf to sell their illegal drugs, and where innocent children are caught daily in the crossfire of drive-by shootings. We cannot ignore the damage that these criminals are doing to our society, and we must take actions to stop these horrors. However, the effort by some misguided individuals to eliminate the legal ownership of firearms does not address the real problem at hand, and simply disarms the innocent law-abiding citizens who are most in need of a form of self-defense. To fully understand the reasons behind the gun control efforts, we must look at the history of our country, and the role firearms have played in it. The second amendment to the Constitution of the United States makes firearm ownership legal in this country. There were good reasons for this freedom, reasons, which persist today. Firearms in the new world were used initially for hunting, and occasionally for self-defense. However, when the colonists felt that the burden of British oppression was too much for them to bear, they picked up their personal firearms and went to war. Standing against the British armies, these rebels found themselves opposed by the greatest military force in the world at that time. The 18th century witnessed the height of the British Empire, but the rough band of colonial freedom fighters discovered the power of the Minuteman, the average American gun owner. These Minutemen, so named because they would pick up their personal guns and jump to the defense of the ir country on a minute's notice, served a major part in winning the American Revolution. The founding fathers of this country understood that an armed populace was instrumental in fighting off oppression, and they made the right to keep and bear arms a constitutionally guaranteed right. Over the years, some of the reasons for owning firearms have changed. As our country grew into a strong nation, we expanded westward, exploring the wilderness, and building new towns on the frontier. Typically, these new towns were far away from the centers of civilization, and the only law they had was dispensed by townsfolk through the barrel of a gun. Crime existed, but could be minimized when the townspeople fought back against the criminals. Eventually, these organized townspeople developed police forces as their towns grew in size. Fewer people carried their firearms on the street, but the firearms were always there, ready to be used in self-defense. It was after the Civil War that the first gun-control advocates came into existence. These were southern leaders who were afraid that the newly freed black slaves would assert their newfound political rights, and these leaders wanted to make it easier to oppress the free blacks. This oppression was accomplished by passing laws making it illegal in many places for black people to own firearms. With that effort, they assured themselves that the black population would be subject to their control, and would not have the ability to fight back. At the same time, the people who were most intent on denying black people their basic rights walked around with their firearms, making it impossible to resist their efforts. An unarmed man stands little chance against an armed one, and these armed men saw their plans work completely. It was a full century before the civil rights activists of the 1960s were able to restore the constitutional freedoms that blacks in this country were granted in the 18 60s. Today's gun control activists are a slightly different breed. They claim that gun violence in this country has gotten to a point where something must be done to stop it. They would like to see criminals disarmed, and they want the random violence to stop. I agree with their sentiments. However, they are going about it in the wrong way. While claiming that they want to take guns out of the hands of criminals, they work to pass legislation that would take the guns out of the hands of law-abiding citizens instead. For this

Free Essays on Power Perspectives

Perspectives on Power In today’s society there are often power struggles about almost everything. As Max Weber points out, we perceive power as the ability to get your way, even over the resistance of others. Social power, political power, or economic power is all supremacy that people want to achieve; but who actually conquers these powers? Who determines such authority? There are three theoretical perspectives in sociology make general statements about how some parts of the world fit together. Sociology uses symbolic interactions, functional analysis, and conflict theory to analyze power relations in society, politics, or economics. Each theory interprets reality in a distinct and unique manner. Symbolic interactions focus on the level of analysis. It examines small -scale patterns of social interaction. It observes what people do when they are in the presence of others. â€Å"Symbolic interaction studies how people use symbols to establish meaning, develop their views of the world, and communicate with one another (Henslin 2002, p.14).† Symbols define for us what relationships are and allow society to exist. Using symbolic interaction one can analyze power relation by examining the status of a person. One who is rich and wealthy may be viewed as powerful because they have luxurious cars, houses and accessories. It can demonstrate the person’s achievements and success which lead them to prosper; therefore, attaining an authoritative position. They use status symbols to identify their power. Parents are symbols of power. They exercise the authority over their children. They have the power to discipline their children, choose schools, religion and mo rality. This is a type pf traditional authority which is based on custom (Henslin 2002, p. 275). The goals of people constantly change over time. People’s standards and symbols of success increase leading them to want more money. As meanings and interpretatio... Free Essays on Power Perspectives Free Essays on Power Perspectives Perspectives on Power In today’s society there are often power struggles about almost everything. As Max Weber points out, we perceive power as the ability to get your way, even over the resistance of others. Social power, political power, or economic power is all supremacy that people want to achieve; but who actually conquers these powers? Who determines such authority? There are three theoretical perspectives in sociology make general statements about how some parts of the world fit together. Sociology uses symbolic interactions, functional analysis, and conflict theory to analyze power relations in society, politics, or economics. Each theory interprets reality in a distinct and unique manner. Symbolic interactions focus on the level of analysis. It examines small -scale patterns of social interaction. It observes what people do when they are in the presence of others. â€Å"Symbolic interaction studies how people use symbols to establish meaning, develop their views of the world, and communicate with one another (Henslin 2002, p.14).† Symbols define for us what relationships are and allow society to exist. Using symbolic interaction one can analyze power relation by examining the status of a person. One who is rich and wealthy may be viewed as powerful because they have luxurious cars, houses and accessories. It can demonstrate the person’s achievements and success which lead them to prosper; therefore, attaining an authoritative position. They use status symbols to identify their power. Parents are symbols of power. They exercise the authority over their children. They have the power to discipline their children, choose schools, religion and mo rality. This is a type pf traditional authority which is based on custom (Henslin 2002, p. 275). The goals of people constantly change over time. People’s standards and symbols of success increase leading them to want more money. As meanings and interpretatio...

Corporate Governance Law Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Corporate Governance Law - Assignment Example According to Turnbull (1999, p. 189), corporate governance is defined as executive procedures and structural organization that is used to manage and direct business towards ensuring financial stability and achievement of objectives. Corporate governance is concerned with the relationship among the Board of Directors, minority shareholders, controlling shareholders, and the management. The history of corporate governance dates back to the nineteenth century when there was increasing emergence of limited liability companies in Europe and America (Klapper and Love, 2003, p. 28). Since then, the system has increased in prominence in many countries across the world because it has proved to contribute to sustainable economic development and the performance of companies. Minow (2002, p. 16) notes that the principles of corporate governance provide the framework for the following: disclosure and transparency, the role of non- financial stakeholders, the Board of Directors responsibilities, r ights of shareholders and other stakeholders and their equal treatment. OECD (2005) states that corporate governance law is at the core of corporate governance and further argue that it provides basis for various aspects of corporate governance hence making it effective. Corporate governance law provides framework for intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, and other vital decisions that relate to corporate governance (Minnow, 2002, p. 71). ... Importance of Corporate Governance Before comparing and contrasting Anglo- American model and European model of corporate governance, it is crucial to understand why corporate governance is important and relevant to countries and companies. According to Bhagat and Bolton (2008, p. 260), numerous studies have shown that corporate governance plays an important role in facilitating and guiding the development processes of countries and organizations towards achievement of their objectives. Klapper and Love (2003, p. 33) argue that even though corporate governance is important for all the countries regardless of their social and economic status, the concept is more crucial in achieving public policy objectives in emerging market countries. Good corporate governance is essential in reducing the vulnerability of emerging market to financial crises, contributes to capital market development, reduces cost of capital and transaction costs, and reinforces property rights (La Rocca, 2007, p. 31 2). Basically, corporate governance is critical in addressing the issue of integrity especially regarding how the management and board of companies are discharging their duties. Apart from that, corporate governance provides the basis for setting up regulatory entity; it allows an organization to introduce regulation and oversee the proper implementation of the regulation. Additionally, this concept is vital in enhancing the institutions’ remunerations and financial policies which enable institutions to make profits and prevent the institutions from effects of financial crises (OECD, 2005). According to Minow (2002, p. 30), strong corporate governance practices significantly increase productivity,